Justification of Life imprisonment in Serbian Criminal Law
نویسندگان
چکیده
In Serbia, disputes have been going on for years (which are also the subject of many congresses) about regulation most severe types punishment. The criminal policy country shows a tendency to toughen penalties. By attracting lot media attention and putting pressure state institutions concerning certain tragic events caused by murder rape minors, including children, some members public hysterically demand that respond with strictest penalties, even if they no longer exist (the death penalty). December 1, 2019 Law Amendments Additions Criminal Code, which, among other things, prescribes life imprisonment, entered into force. It is assumed fact there sentence particularly serious crimes, such as or crimes against sexual freedom in forms, may make criminals think twice before committing them. addition, proponents introduction punishment argue fear imprisonment can act corrective preventive measure, thereby reducing proportion these offenses. paper provides critical analysis this justification return law. arguments include: 1) statistics confirm possible who committed offenses not factor prevention; 2) general prevention undermined; 3) previously existing maximum prison term was an obstacle, is, it innovations would change decisions criminals, although were their sound mind at time offenses, realizing illegality actions; 4) becomes impossible carry out correction re-socialization sentenced person, knows he will remain closed outside social family environment rest his life; 5) necessary keep financially maintains criminals.
منابع مشابه
Challenges arising from the conciseness of Islamic criminal law in the implementation of alternatives to imprisonment
Due to the relatively emerging issue of alternatives to imprisonment, the Iranian judicial system has always faced various legal challenges, as the case may be, in the process of determining or implementing them. Authors with analytical and library method and with the knowledge of the wide range of legal challenges on the subject in terms of aspect and territory, only to a specific aspect an...
متن کاملImprisonment and Criminal Discourse
In this work, I would like to question the canonical view of prison, which underlies the daily practice of law, and criminal law courses at law schools. Our criminal discourse excessively limits, or even forbids, the possibility of discussing imprisonment. In this way, imprisonment, a rudimentary and brutal tool, is criminal law ́s ordinary means of punishment, and there is no evidence that lega...
متن کاملWeak-Minded Responsibility in Iranian Criminal Law and Egyptian Law
In Iran's criminal law, humans are not only divided into wise or insane they are also persons who, on the one hand, do not fall under Article 149 of the Islamic Penal Code in the definition of insane persons and on the other hand, they are not wise, the rational age of these people is lower than their child's physical age that Affected by mental disorder and mental retardation. Article 91 of th...
متن کاملProperties Attachment in Iranian Criminal Law
One of judicial decision is properties attachment that it is enacted in article 215 code of criminal law about property that is means for committing offence or is obtained due to it or is used during committing offence or is denoted for applying offence. Attachment makes out above properties from ownership and possession of owner and possessor. Nature of attachment is a Taziry punishment which ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Lex Russica
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1729-5920', '2686-7869']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.174.5.134-142